Search results
The Apple Public Source License (APSL) is the open-source and free software license under which Apple's Darwin operating system was released in 2000. A free and open-source software license was voluntarily adopted to further involve the community from which much of Darwin originated.
- 2.0
- APSL-1.0, APSL-1.1, APSL-1.2, APSL-2.0
- August 6, 2003
- Apple Inc.
Apple Public Source License (APSL) is een vrije softwarelicentie voor opensourcesoftware. De APSL wordt onder meer gebruikt voor Darwin OS , macOS , Safari , Pages en Numbers . Veel software van Apple die onder de APSL werd uitgebracht werd later ook uitgebracht onder de Apache-licentie .
- 6 augustus 2003
- Ja
- Nee
- 2.0
Although some parts of iOS are open source under the Apple Public Source License and other licenses, iOS is proprietary software. Major versions of iOS are released annually. The current stable version, iOS 17, was released to the public on September 18, 2023.
- June 29, 2007; 16 years ago
- Apple Inc.
- 17.0.3 (October 4, 2023; 1 day ago) [±]
1. General; Definitions. This License applies to any program or other work which Apple Inc. ("Apple") makes publicly available and which contains a notice placed by Apple identifying such program or work as "Original Code" and stating that it is subject to the terms of this Apple Public Source License version 2.0 ("License").
- Definitions
- Comparison to Copyleft
- Comparison to Public Domain
- License Compatibility
- Reception and Adoption
- Other Terms
- See Also
The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you l...
Copyleft licenses generally require the reciprocal publication of the source code of any modified versions under the original work's copyleft license. Permissive licenses, in contrast, do not try to guarantee that modified versions of the software will remain free and publicly available, generally requiring only that the original copyright notice b...
Computer Associates Int'l v. Altai used the term "public domain" to refer to works that have become widely shared and distributed under permission, rather than work that was deliberately put into the public domain. However, permissive licenses are not actually equivalent to releasing a work into the public domain. Permissive licenses often do stipu...
In general permissive licenses have good license compatibilitywith most other software licenses in most situations. Due to their non-restrictiveness, most permissive software licenses are even compatible with copyleft licenses, which are incompatible with most other licenses. Some older permissive licenses, such as the 4-clause BSD license, the PHP...
While they have been in use since the mid-1980s,several authors noted an increase in the popularity of permissive licenses during the 2010s. As of 2015,[update] the MIT License, a permissive license, is the most popular free software license, followed by GPLv2.
Non-copyleft
Sometimes the word "permissive" is considered too ambiguous, because all free software licenses are "permissive", in the sense that they all allow to modify and redistribute the source code. In most cases the real opposition is between copyleftlicenses and non-copyleft ones, thus some authors prefer to use the term "non-copyleft" instead of "permissive".
Copycenter
Copycenter is a term originally used to explain the modified BSD license, a permissive free-software license. The term was presented by computer scientist and Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) contributor Marshall Kirk McKusick at a BSD conference in 1999. It is a word play on copyright, copyleft and copy center.
Pushover license
In the Free Software Foundation's guide to license compatibility and relicensing, Richard Stallman defines permissive licenses as "pushover licenses", comparing them to those people who "can't say no", because they are seen as granting a right to "deny freedom to others."The Foundation recommends pushover licenses only for small programs, below 300 lines of code, where "the benefits provided by copyleft are usually too small to justify the inconvenience of making sure a copy of the license al...
6 aug. 2003 · By TMO Staff. Aug 6th, 2003 5:00 PM EDT. Apple has updated its Apple Public Source License (APSL), bringing it to version 2.0. Version 2.0 of the APSL is now considered a Free Software...
Die Apple Public Source License (APSL) ist die Open-Source-Lizenz, unter der Apple das Darwin-Betriebssystem verfügbar gemacht hat. Die erste Version wurde nur von der Open Source Initiative anerkannt, die zweite Version entspricht jedoch auch den Richtlinien der Free Software Foundation.
